I have a big week coming up. First, the podcast will be officially launched on Tuesday – more on that later. On Friday I am going to participate in an event at the National Press Club in Washington DC. That\’s either very exciting or quite scary. Probably both.
Here is the official announcement:
——–
To join the event live, please contact john.briley@getbetterhealth.com Seating is limited…
Congressman Paul Ryan
Media Personality Rea Blakey
Giant inflatable Santa
Health Care Reform: Putting Patients First
Elected Officials Join America’s Top Medical Bloggers to Discuss the Real,
Clinical Impact of Health Care Reform
WHEN:
Friday, July 17, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
WHERE:
The National Press Club, Broadcast Operations Center 4th Floor, 529 14th St. NW, Washington, DC
WHO:
Keynote: Representative Paul Ryan, (R-WI), House Budget Committee Ranking Member
Moderator: Rea Blakey, Emmy award-winning health reporter and news anchor, previously with ABC, CNN, and now with Discovery Health
Host: Val Jones, M.D., CEO and Founder of Better Health
Policy Expert: Robert Goldberg, Ph.D., co-founder and vice president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest (CMPI)
Primary Care Panelists:
Kevin Pho, M.D., Internist and author of KevinMD
Rob Lamberts, M.D., Med/Peds specialist and author of Musings of a Distractible Mind
Alan Dappen, M.D., Family Physician and Better Health contributor
Valerie Tinley, N.P., Nurse Practitioner and Better Health contributor
Specialty Care Panelists:
Kim McAllister, R.N., Emergency Medicine nurse and author of Emergiblog
Westby Fisher, M.D., Cardiac Electrophysiologist and author of Dr.Wes
Rich Fogoros, M.D., Cardiologist and author of Covert Rationing Blog And Fixing American Healthcare
Jim Herndon, M.D., past president of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Better Health contributor
####
For more information on Better Health, visit http://www.getbetterhealth.com.
———
OK, I added the Santa.
That’s really great!
That’s really great!
I love it that medical bloggers are right up there with media personalities and senators! Go get ’em Rob!
I love it that medical bloggers are right up there with media personalities and senators! Go get ’em Rob!
you may be ready for Washington, but is Washington ready for YOU?
go get ’em indeed!!!
you may be ready for Washington, but is Washington ready for YOU?
go get ’em indeed!!!
Wow — that’s awesome! And because I’m a ginormous dork, I’m hugely impressed that I’ve read these folks’ blogs and have even co-commented on some with them. Oh well :)) Rock on!
Wow — that’s awesome! And because I’m a ginormous dork, I’m hugely impressed that I’ve read these folks’ blogs and have even co-commented on some with them. Oh well :)) Rock on!
Here are some more ideas:
1) Physician reimbursement rated depend on patient feedback and turnover rates. Highly rated doctors and those with low average turnover get a 10% higher reimbursement rate. Those with high turnover and bad feedback, get docked 10%. Rewarding and penalizing on those two metrics together should overall reduce costs and improve quality.
2) For tests that have been ordered recently from multiple sources — if the first to order does not share– 10% cut on reimbursement. Second to order — did not check — 10% reimbursement cut. Second institution does not order but uses recent tests — 10% bonus to both sides of the transaction. Exception for highly critical situations or where previous test results would not have been useful.
3) Require price transparency for medications, tests and procedures so that consumers can shop — and give some sort of rebate for choosing lower cost alternatives.It is crazy that for expenditures the size of medical bills, people cannot comparison shop. For example, the local MRI is an old 1.5T and wants $5000 for test a. MRI across the country has much better resolution (3T) and because it is cash only, charges $450. I could fly cross country, stay at the nicest hotel, eat at the nicest restaraunt and still pay for some darn good shopping for the price difference. Frankly, I would happy just that my insurance would reimburse me for the whole $450. But they won’t so my next MRI will be on the dinosaur and they will pay through the nose. I have seen $300 a month differences in the cost of a prescription depending on where I get it filled — advertised — not. And if my only part of the deal is to pay gas money and wait in line, guess what, I’ll go to the nearby place with no line, even if it costs the insurance company more. This could be addressed pretty easily.
Here are some more ideas:
1) Physician reimbursement rated depend on patient feedback and turnover rates. Highly rated doctors and those with low average turnover get a 10% higher reimbursement rate. Those with high turnover and bad feedback, get docked 10%. Rewarding and penalizing on those two metrics together should overall reduce costs and improve quality.
2) For tests that have been ordered recently from multiple sources — if the first to order does not share– 10% cut on reimbursement. Second to order — did not check — 10% reimbursement cut. Second institution does not order but uses recent tests — 10% bonus to both sides of the transaction. Exception for highly critical situations or where previous test results would not have been useful.
3) Require price transparency for medications, tests and procedures so that consumers can shop — and give some sort of rebate for choosing lower cost alternatives.It is crazy that for expenditures the size of medical bills, people cannot comparison shop. For example, the local MRI is an old 1.5T and wants $5000 for test a. MRI across the country has much better resolution (3T) and because it is cash only, charges $450. I could fly cross country, stay at the nicest hotel, eat at the nicest restaraunt and still pay for some darn good shopping for the price difference. Frankly, I would happy just that my insurance would reimburse me for the whole $450. But they won’t so my next MRI will be on the dinosaur and they will pay through the nose. I have seen $300 a month differences in the cost of a prescription depending on where I get it filled — advertised — not. And if my only part of the deal is to pay gas money and wait in line, guess what, I’ll go to the nearby place with no line, even if it costs the insurance company more. This could be addressed pretty easily.